Authors: Yujia Guo, Morteza Roostaei, Alireza Nouri, Vahidoddin Fattahpour, Mahdi Mahmoudi, Heeseok Jung
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is the primary thermal recovery technology currently employed to extract heavy oil and high-viscosity bitumen from Alberta oil sands. In the near-wellbore region, the initial stresses are nearly zero, and as the SAGD chamber grows, the stresses tend to build up due to the thermal expansion of the formation. Also, melting of the bitumen and subsequent loss of the bonding between the grains leads to the collapse of the gap between the formation and sand control liner over time. The result will be effective stress buildup and gradual compaction of the oil sands around the liner.
Slotted liners have been extensively used as a sand control device in SAGD wells. Slotted liners must allow free flow through the slots with minimal plugging and acceptable amounts of sand production.
In our study, large-scale unconsolidated sand was packed over a multi-slot coupon of the slotted liner. The sand-pack was subjected to several stress conditions corresponding to the evolving stress conditions during the life cycle of a SAGD producer well. The testing program employed several multi-slot coupons to examine the flow performance under typical encountered stresses in SAGD wells. Cumulative produced sand was measured at the end of testing as an indicator of the sand control performance. The permeability evolution of the sand in the near-coupon zone was calculated by measurements of pressure differentials and considered as a measure of screen flow performance. Fines/clay concentration along the sand-pack was also quantified after the test to investigate the fines migration, a phenomenon which is considered to be the main reason for reduced wellbore productivity.
Experimental results show that the liner performance is significantly affected by the normal stress buildup on the liner. Experimental observations indicate sand-pack compaction due to the increase of effective stress around the liner leads to a lower porosity and permeability. The situation near the liner is further complicated by the fines accumulation that results in pore plugging and further permeability reduction. When it comes to sanding, however, higher stresses help stabilize the sand bridges behind the slots, leading to less sand production.
As for the design criteria, the lower and upper bounds of the slot size are governed by plugging and sand production, respectively. Considering the stress effect on plugging and sanding, testing data indicate that both the lower and upper bounds should be revised to larger slot aperture sizes.